As some of you know, I am part owner of Lot #4, as full owner of Parcel B, as shown in the image below. The properties are vacant, undeveloped land with little vehicle access.
I'm in an easement dispute with the owner of Parcel A, who is building a house. His opinion is that the easement is shared easement between Parcel A, Parcel B, and Lot #4. The easement language, validated by my attorney, state that the easement benefits Lot #4 only.
I have little available access to Gov. Lot #4, except for one old logging road that meanders northward along the line dividing Parcel A and Parcel B. He improved this road for access to his house, and either he or his crew's vehicles, are parking on the logging road. This completely blocks my access to Gov. Lot #4, as the easement area to the left and right of the logging road has rocks, stumps, and other debris that makes unsafe to drive in my vehicle.
Picture below.
As you can see, the owner of Parcel A has declared that the full clearcut area is available for his use and benefit. I believe he needs to keep his activities on his parcel, which is the left of the black line. The vehicles are blocking my access to Lot #4 and also partially on my property. He has stated in writing that he believes he has full use of the clearcut area, both his property and mine, and plans to use it for his benefit.
I've already communicated with him via phone and e-mail. That has been unproductive. What is the next logical step to keep him off our property and keep the logging road that provides access to Lot #4 clear? I have no plans to build or improve the property at the current time, but wish to drive in the Lot #4 a few times each year. I do not have a four wheel drive vehicle.



