While that is true, it's overly simplified. You still have to make a prima facie (google it) case that those elements existed and that is further complicated by AZ's product liability statutes 12-681 through 12-689 which you can read at:Can someone please correct me if I am wrong. I thought in cases of strict product liability that the plaintiff does not have to prove negligence?
As long as:
-the product was being used for the purpose for which it was intended
-the product was not modified
-the product caused injury
the manufacturer, store, or anyone in the supply chain could be held liable for damages.
https://www.azleg.gov/arsDetail/?title=12

