
Quoting
Endofdays
I did not consent to my hospitalization. Plain and simple. I protested when the police brought me. I protested at the hospital. I said -- I do not want psychiatric services right when they asked me to sign a waiver on damaged or lost property. It says on my discharge papers: "pt disagrees with diagnosis." There was no consent. They unlawfully threatened me with homelessness if I did not cooperate with them. That is not consent. Threatening to destroy evidence of my victimization is not consent. Telling me that the judge will rule against me by default is not consent. All these threats amount to unlawful extortion.
As for the counsel issue -- there is a right to effective counsel under the due process clause. This was violated by the attorney. If the attorney gives advice that is so bad as to deprive of effective counsel (and this was), then this right is violated and is cause for contesting the charge.
And I'm reporting you to the DOJ for harassment. Your statements amount to tampering with a crime victim, and are intended to delay the reporting of the offense to a federal judge. This act of obstruction, in this context, also renders you liable for complicity in a sex trafficking offense. Reported. Deleting this post constitutes destruction of evidence of a victim tampering offense.
If I say they made all those threats, you kinda have to assume them to be true. And any idiot knows it they made all those threats there is no consent.
And I presented clear evidence that HIPAA was not the only remedy. A 1983 due process was available. You seem to be working for the hospital. Trust me there was no consent. Even the Dr. admitted on the discharge papers I disagreed with the diagnosis.
Not true. My legal cause of action is huge. They're trying to protect themselves from a major lawsuit.
I have the evidence to prove conspiracy. Just like I provided right up there that you gave me fraudulent advice by acting as though there was no 42 U.S.C. 1983 remedy.
Do you actually think putting a gun to someone's head and getting them to sign a contract makes it valid? Cause I'll tell you, if you do you're obviously not representing the law accurately, which again, makes you guilty of fraudulent misrepresentation and tampering. There was a contract I signed about 2/3 into my time there. This contract actually needed to be signed at admission, not after they groomed me for weeks on a whole bunch of extortion threats. I protested every step of the way. But they continued to make the threats and overcame my resistance. They had the attorney -- working for them, not me -- sit there and badger me for like 20 minutes straight with the contract, while I kept refusing and refusing over and over again. It was so gratuitously forced it wasn't even funny. And this was my effective counsel? More like, their effective counsel (again rendering all all invalid anyway). All the while they flashed the word "homeless" at me (which was written on the for as my housing status) to re-iterate the threat of unlawful homelessness. They said, if you want to be discharged you'll be discharged to the homeless shelter (living in dumpster homeless). If I signed I could get housing through the disability system, and eventually be discharged, and then collect my evidence (without it being destroyed) report the entire act of extortion and fight it. Traffickers often coerce their victims into signing contracts, as if their signature actually means something, even though their holding a gun to their head. Nice try guy. But you're guilty of a major felony with the advice your provided here.