Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst ... 3 4 5
Results 41 to 43 of 43
  1. #41
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Posts
    8,238

    Default Re: Legality of Staged Atrocity Propaganda

    Quote Quoting haha
    View Post
    If you have time I could certainly present to you the facts and how the Deception planners performed the illusion. But the point I'm making here is that this regime is using Staged Atrocity Propaganda to achieve political goals. This is happening. And we all need to face this.


    You assert that it is happening. I don’t know you and have no particular reason to believe your assertion. I have looked at the claims of those who say Sandy Hook was simply contrived by the government and did not really happen and, as I said, I do not find the evidence they claim to be persuasive on that. Apparently you do. I am not predisposed either way. I recognize that any government, including ours, is capable of doing things that are immoral and unethical. Indeed, our government has done some very outrageous things at times. But recognizing that does not mean I'm inclined to jump on board with every claim made that the government has done something underhanded. I simply look at the evidence and decide from that. And the Sandy Hook conspiracy evidence is weak at best and certainly not sufficiently convincing to me. If you want to believe it based on such evidence that’s up to you. Perhaps you are predisposed to believe in such things. As I say I don’t know you to know where you are coming from. No doubt you’d respond that the evidence is not weak, but on that we will have to agree to disagree on that, I think. Every person weighs evidence differently and reaches their own conclusions from it.

  2. #42
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Posts
    4,301

    Default Re: Legality of Staged Atrocity Propaganda

    "Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence."


    HaHa has the first part of that down.

  3. #43
    Join Date
    Mar 2018
    Posts
    10

    Default Re: Legality of Staged Atrocity Propaganda

    Quote Quoting Taxing Matters
    View Post


    You assert that it is happening. I don’t know you and have no particular reason to believe your assertion. I have looked at the claims of those who say Sandy Hook was simply contrived by the government and did not really happen and, as I said, I do not find the evidence they claim to be persuasive on that. Apparently you do. I am not predisposed either way. I recognize that any government, including ours, is capable of doing things that are immoral and unethical. Indeed, our government has done some very outrageous things at times. But recognizing that does not mean I'm inclined to jump on board with every claim made that the government has done something underhanded. I simply look at the evidence and decide from that. And the Sandy Hook conspiracy evidence is weak at best and certainly not sufficiently convincing to me. If you want to believe it based on such evidence that’s up to you. Perhaps you are predisposed to believe in such things. As I say I don’t know you to know where you are coming from. No doubt you’d respond that the evidence is not weak, but on that we will have to agree to disagree on that, I think. Every person weighs evidence differently and reaches their own conclusions from it.
    That's right. I assert that it is happening.

    I have also pointed out that Deception operations that are not merely confined to law enforcement stings are legal.

    My poorly worded original question was about how to deal with the fact that Deception operations involving Staged Atrocity Propaganda are being used to achieve political goals and the destruction of a Constitutional right.

    You responded with what you thought our recourse was. That is, to lobby Congress.

    I have not placed words in your mouth and I'd appreciate it if you did' t do that to me. Regarding the "evidence" - I have pointed you to the science of Counterdeception. A review of that science would help you to weigh the "evidence" you have been presented with a rational consideration of organized Deception.

    What sort of "evidence" would you have accepted concerning the David P. Khoury case - absent a Justice Department admission? Counterdeception methods would have exposed that as a fraud WITHOUT the government admission of Deception.

    I think that the responses I have received here on this thread point to a massive void in knowledge of how Deception works. Not only that but a lot of cognitive bias towards "belief" of controlled governmental information channels.

    I'm not sure how that problem can be remedied.

    Quote Quoting free9man
    View Post
    And out comes the drooling, foaming at the mouth conspiracy theorist everyone already suspected was there.

    That or a troll. Either way, beyond our help and beneath contempt.
    Oh look - another idiot "bleever".

    You are certainly beneath my contempt.

    Quote Quoting PayrolGuy
    View Post
    "Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence."


    HaHa has the first part of that down.
    It is extraordinary claim to make that this regime is using organized Deception operations to trick fools like you.

    BTW, I will let you in on a secret: When they do the cut-the-lady-in-half-trick....they don't really cut her in half.

    And when they do a mass shooting - they don't really shoot anyone.

    Quite honestly, I am a bit disgusted with the low-brow cognitive bias displayed by some of you. It's disgusting, really.

    Quote Quoting Taxing Matters
    View Post


    You assert that it is happening. I don’t know you and have no particular reason to believe your assertion. I have looked at the claims of those who say Sandy Hook was simply contrived by the government and did not really happen and, as I said, I do not find the evidence they claim to be persuasive on that. Apparently you do. I am not predisposed either way. I recognize that any government, including ours, is capable of doing things that are immoral and unethical. Indeed, our government has done some very outrageous things at times. But recognizing that does not mean I'm inclined to jump on board with every claim made that the government has done something underhanded. I simply look at the evidence and decide from that. And the Sandy Hook conspiracy evidence is weak at best and certainly not sufficiently convincing to me. If you want to believe it based on such evidence that’s up to you. Perhaps you are predisposed to believe in such things. As I say I don’t know you to know where you are coming from. No doubt you’d respond that the evidence is not weak, but on that we will have to agree to disagree on that, I think. Every person weighs evidence differently and reaches their own conclusions from it.
    When you say you 'have looked at the claims of those who say Sandy Hook" was faked - whose claims have you looked at specifically?

    Operations like that one are called "Denial and Deception" operations.

    The "Denial" portion is the post event security element of the Deception that seeks to protect the Deception core. Part of "Denial" operations is to pollute the information space with easily debunked claims.

    I suggest you read up a bit on D & D Operations.

    This is something that you can't really defend yourself against if you don't even have a clue how it works.

    Quote Quoting Mr. Knowitall
    View Post
    Why argue with a troll who, with true honesty in branding, picked the username "haha"? If you don't like trolls, don't feed 'em.
    You have identified yourself as a "troll" by posting your idiotic comment.

    Go away.

    For those of you reading through this thread, I wish to point out the commentary by posters who know absolutely nothing at all about organized Deception or the science of Counterdeception.

    Most of the responses were purely idiotic coming from those in Denial.

    One respondent did offer useful insight in how to deal with the problem of government sponsored Staged Atrocity Propaganda.

    Overall, I expected much more than simply blind denial and the regurgitation of official stories.

    But there it is for all to read.

    1. Sponsored Links
       

Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst ... 3 4 5

Similar Threads

  1. Traffic Accidents: How to Prove a Car Accident Was Staged
    By lex_ in forum Accidents and Injuries
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 11-26-2013, 09:23 AM
  2. Defamation: Business Sells Harmful Propaganda and Destroyed My Organization
    By REV-X in forum Defamation, Slander And Libel
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 06-24-2011, 02:50 AM
  3. Getting Fired: Terminated for Propaganda - Sexual Discrimination/Retaliation
    By eltonscott in forum Employment and Labor
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 04-22-2010, 08:23 PM
  4. Defamation: Defamation of Character and hate propaganda
    By caledmab in forum Defamation, Slander And Libel
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 09-07-2006, 08:39 AM
  5. Traffic Accidents: Staged Accident
    By StagedAccident in forum Accidents and Injuries
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 03-02-2006, 04:37 PM
 
 
Sponsored Links

Legal Help, Information and Resources