Yes, omit unnecessary details. Not omit necessary details.
And you're right. I think the rule should be clarified so people do ask questions based on some detail about what's happening to them. Just seems to be common sense to me.
That was a necessary detail.
That you lost a foreclosure case means you are looking at the wrong statute. 735 ILCS 5/9 et seq applies to landlord-tenant relationships, not foreclosures. So that section you are asking about shouldn't apply to you.
The foreclosure statute is 735 ILCS 5/15 et seq and I think the post-foreclosure possessory actions are addressed beginning with 735 ILCS 5/1508:
http://www.ilga.gov/legislation/ilcs...qEnd=115900000
If your question involves the bank not having put you out of the house since last March, I have no answer to what the bank might do now.
Are there more details that you would like to share as to what is happening to you now?
By the way, please keep all future discussion to this thread and don't open up any new ones on this situation. It only leads to parallel discussions and it's not appreciated here.


