My question involves a traffic ticket from the state of: Washington
I've seen the argument a couple of times suggesting that there is a problem with the officer making the estimate subsequent to the SMD reading.
Here are two examples:
https://www.expertlaw.com/forums/sho...907#post610907
https://www.expertlaw.com/forums/sho...160#post370160
What is the problem with the estimate coming after the SMD? And what is the basis for any objection or motion surrounding such an error?
The only other error I can find is that the Officer does not list any distance check on the LIDAR, listing only the head's up alignment test and the internal test.
Thanks much for any help!

