Yep, already did that. It's public land. Already confirmed with the Chief Construction Inspector who sent the takedown notice, the day the takedown notice was sent, that he didn't even need to send out a surveyor to confirm such things before issuing said takedown notice. It was that obvious. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to look at a basic map, and a 143 year old plat, and a subdivision plat, and look at the blocks of parcels, and the consistent 100 foot width of the streets running alongside and around them, etc. etc. etc. to see that the area was MOST DEFINITELY, without any controversy whatsoever, good old public land. PS- The nearby property manager that put up the fence illegally wasn't even claiming that it was his land in the first place, as evidenced in the full email chain that he was participating in, between him and the city. He admitted that he had not gotten a minor amendment yet for the area in question, and was essentially asking for forgiveness in place of permission on the topic of the illegal fence going up in the mean time:
Hate Crime Email Chain Between Eric Holsapple And The City Of Fort Collins
And now here are those maps and plats you speak of (that I ALREADY offered a long time ago, in my FIRST post on the topic):
Fort Collins Citydocs Original 143 Year Old Town Plat
Fort Collins Original Town Plat (Zoomed Into Robinson Piersal Plaza PUD Area
FCMaps City Map Of The Robinson Piersal Plaza PUD
Larimer County Map Of The Robinson Piersal Plaza PUD
Robinson Piersal Plaza PUD Subdivision Plat, Master Plan, Preliminary And Final Site Plan
Yep, and the city owns the land, and retains the exclusive rights to said land, whereby they sent a takedown notice for a fence that illegally went up on said land, in order to reclaim control of said land, because somebody was trying to exercise their control over said land, without lawful justification in order to legally do so. And so the the city took back their land, from the one who took it, by sending a takedown notice, to the the party who took it, demanding that they give it back, or if not, that they (the city) will be taking the land back themselves, in 10 days, by taking the fence down themselves, and then billing the one who took it, for making them do such preposterous things.
Bingo. The public owns the land, and thus, retains the inherent right of ownership to said land. Without a valid permit in effect to legally restrict the use of said land, that inherent right is now restored. (Or should have been, by the cops that night, by not arresting me for being within said area.)
I believe your continued harping on the land being some sort special land that needs some sort of special treatment in order to determine who it belongs to, and whose rights are involved, is what is ridiculous.

