Quote Quoting Taxing Matters
View Post
I assume the Boulder police simply cited you for the ordinance violation. I think that even if the police lacked probable cause for the citation that you would get nothing for suing for the 14th amendment violation. (Not 4th Amendment, which applies only to the federal government. The protection of the 4th Amendment is made applicable to the states and local governments by the 14th amendment.) That’s because you have suffered no legally recognized damages from it. The U.S. Supreme Court has held that absent actual damages all you would get from the violation (which would be brought in federal court under 42 U.S.C. § 1983) is $1, i.e. a symbolic win. As it would cost you more than that to sue, it is not worthwhile. Nor does Colorado law provide you any damages beyond your actual damages, either.
Oh boy, I am hesitant to agree with you that no other damages could be sought. After simply googling "damages in a 42 USC" I clicked on the first two links. Perhaps you are mistaken?

9.1 Damages | Federal Practice Manual For Legal Aid Attorneys

Litigating Damages And Attorney Fees In Section 1983 Litigation: Capitalizing On The Law

According to the latter link:

A plaintiff successfully pressing a section 1983 claim may recover a broad range of both compensatory and punitive damages. Compensatory damages may include costs of medical care and supplies, lost wages (i.e., back pay and lost future earnings), physical pain and suffering, emotional pain and suffering, and disability / loss of normal life. Where liability is found, but compensatory damages cannot be proven, the jury will be instructed to return a nominal damage award (typically one dollar). Although a trivial sum, even a nominal damage award may open the door for an award of punitive damages or attorney fees. Courts have rejected the availability of presumed damages unless traditional damages are difficult to prove. In addition, a court may reduce compensatory damages where the plaintiff only offers generalized evidence of emotional pain and suffering, not rising to a level that is commensurate with the amount awarded by the jury. While section 1983 damages are based on common law concepts, they are not dependent on the law of the forum state.

Quote Quoting jk
View Post
If you are on private property the owner can have you removed (referring to your Wal-Mart and Safeway drive situstions).
Wow, thanks man, I never knew such things! I guess because I can safely assume just like you now that nobody wants me out there, that I should just go "get a job" or something to that effect?

I apologize if that came across as harsh, but I don't need people "getting down on their knees" to school me on such elementary crap. You think I haven't heard that before? Of course private property owners can have me removed if they don't want me out there.

But hey, try this thought on for size, that a lot of private property owners *don't* care that I'm loitering / panhandling / canvassing on their property. Has that ever occurred to you? And just so you know, regarding the two properties in question, they don't care, and have historically not cared, that people do such things on their property.

Thanks for providing such deep wisdom on the subject though!