
Quoting
muneca
Here is the portion from the decree:
Ordered and adjudged that plaintiff shall have custody of the minor child(ren) of the marriage, (child’s name and information here).
The requirements of D.R.L. 240 1 (a-1) have been met and the court having considered the results of said inquiries, it is ordered and adjudged that defendant shall have visitation with the minor child(ren) of the marriage according to the following schedule: as plaintiff and defendant have mutually and amicably agreed, at defendants reasonable and timely request.
I did ask my attorney and he stated that as per the child support order the plaintiff is the custodian. When I reviewed the child support paperwork from the court, the term custodian is used but there is no mention of legal, physical, sole or joint custody at all.