My question involves a marriage in the state of: California
The petitioner commited fraud by transfering some pieces of property that belong to the community. At trial, the respondents lawyer used Section 1100 of the CA Family Law. It seems like the respondents lawyer only requested 75%- 50 the petitioner tried to defraud and 25% that belong to her.*
The property was purchase by the community but someone else place on title (family member of petitioner) At dirvoce, petitioner claim 25% of the 50% of the community and he had the other 50% under the family. All was purchase with community funds and belong to the community. Court order 50/50.*
At trial for damages, the respondents lawyer only requested 75%. The court ordered that respondent keep 100% of the property. Can a judge give more than requested by the respondents lawyer? The petitioner lawyer claims otherwise and the respondents lawyers agrees... Respondent lawyer fought the case wrong.*
Please help!!

