Quote Quoting Mr. Knowitall
View Post
Trying an "I wasn't speeding" defense after tacitly admitting that you were speeding at the time you were ticketed is also something of a long shot.
I may have been going 36 or 37.... In a 35. That's not what I was charged with. The cop was very nice, respectful, etc. and did not seem like the kind of guy to make things up, I think it was an honest mistake or equipment malfunction due to interference.

Back to the legal aspect...

Does the court have to supply the certification if they're not going to present it in court? If the court is saying discovery is fulfilled then I would say there's no certification and if they say there is, would I then challenge it as inadmissable because it wasn't produced during discovery?

Would I have to submit an information request to the LEA? Those take more than 2 weeks.

I'd obviously rather solve this as a point of law, as explaining how a RADAR unit is interfering with another RADAR unit is not on the top list of things judges want to hear..

I appreciate your help.