I appreciate your response. You stated that, "courts have generally upheld the requirement of a state to require a person moving to that state to register who was convicted of a sex offense in some other state" and that is true. But I believe from what I have read over the last year that is largely referring to sex offenders currently on the registry, not those who are no longer required to register. If I recall correctly there are at least three cases on record (not sure of legal terms for that) that. One talks about a man who moved from one state to another. He had been released from the sex offender registry prier to his move. He was arrested in the other state for failure to registry. He faught this arrest in court and the court ruled in his favor stating that by making him register that it created a Ex Post Facto problem. Again I don't know the law and will check with an attorney before I actually decide to move. Just trying to gather information ahead of that. Thank you for your help.

