Right.
That section applies to a debt collector's behavior prior to filing a lawsuit.
During a lawsuit the doctrine of "abuse of process" could apply.
However, according to the Colorado Court of Appeals:
The court goes on to explain all those elements starting on Page 7:to prevail on an abuse of process claim, a plaintiff
must prove the defendant (1) had an ulterior purpose in using a
judicial proceeding; (2) used the proceeding in an improper manner
by taking a willful action that was improper in the proceeding’s
regular course; and (3) caused damage.
https://www.courts.state.co.us/Court...0/08CA1867.pdf
In the OP's case neither (1) or (2) appear to apply and with regard to (3) the court said:
Looks like OP is just stuck with getting served twice.mere vexation or frustration without demonstrable
damage is insufficient to sustain liability.

