I understand Damages. Damage to the property could create Damages (in the legal sense) to the landlord.
It's pretty well established that painting is normal wear and tear and isn't considered damages in the legal sense. Unless it was needed due to some damage in the literal sense.

And I answered Mr K already.

Thank you for the responses. It seems they can not make a contract that conflicts with the law. The statute trumps.

Side note: Hopefully it's irreverent anyway as the itemized bill was not sent until 34 days after the termination of the lease and return of the rental unit. (And a forwarding address was left) The statute is strict and only gives them 30 days. I've found some good case law on that issue. Thanks again.