Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    3

    Exclamation New Union Seeks to Dethrone Teamsters at UPS

    My question here is,,,if these guys are successful, what legal precedent would they have to take control of Teamster pension funds that were contributed on behalf of UPS employees?


    Group seeking control of UPS employee pension assets
    Pension and Investment Online
    February 22, 2007

    Association of Parcel Workers of America expects to launch its campaign Friday to replace the Teamsters at United Parcel Service of America Inc. and take control of UPS employees’ share of more than $50 billion in multiemployer pension funds and more than $1 billion in annual contributions.

    The dissident labor group plans to ask 238,000 UPS workers represented by the International Brotherhood of Teamsters to sign individual petition cards requesting that the new organization represent them in collective bargaining, said Van Skillman, a UPS driver from Greensboro, N.C., and the president and co-founder of the organization.

    The APWA cited better pension fund management and higher pension benefits as key reasons for seeking to replace the Teamsters.

    The group needs at least 30% of the Teamster-represented UPS employees to sign the cards in order to ask the National Labor Relations Board to hold an election to determine which union will serve as the labor representative, Mr. Skillman said.

    The $30.2 billion Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust Fund, Seattle; $20.7 billion Central States, Southeast and Southwestern Areas Pension Fund, Rosemont, Ill.; and $3.4 billion New England Teamsters and Trucking Industry Pension Fund, Burlington, Mass., are the three largest of 21 multiemployer Teamster funds covering UPS union members.

    UPS contributed $1.289 billion to multiemployer funds in 2005, according to its most recent 10-K report. “The vast, vast majority of it” went to Teamster pension funds, said Norman Black, UPS spokesman; he didn’t have a figure. Mr. Black declined to comment on the APWA effort.

    Galen Munroe, Teamster press secretary, said in a statement, “We don't believe that the APWA is a legitimate labor union, they have no filings with the Department of Labor and they have never negotiated any contracts.”

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Behind a Desk
    Posts
    98,846

    Default Re: New Union Seeks to Dethrone Teamsters at UPS--Federal

    What are the terms of the collective bargaining agreement in relation to the pension funds? If the CBA gives the union management authority over the pension funds, that should pass to the new union.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    3

    Default Re: New Union Seeks to Dethrone Teamsters at UPS--Federal

    Potential Teamster rival begins campaign to woo UPS employees
    Pensions and Investments Online
    By Barry B. Burr

    Posted: March 5, 2007, 6:01 AM EST


    The Association of Parcel Workers of America kicked off its campaign to replace the Teamsters union as labor representative at United Parcel Service of America Inc. and take control of UPS employees’ share of more than $50 billion assets in Teamster multiemployer pension funds and more than $1 billion in annual UPS contributions.

    The dissident labor group exclusively comprising UPS workers is asking 238,000 workers represented by the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Washington, to sign individual petition cards, asking for their authorization for the new APWA organization to represent them in collective bargaining at the company, said Van Skillman, a UPS driver from Greensboro, N.C., and president and co-founder of the new union.

    The key issue for the APWA is better pension fund management and higher and more equitable pension benefits that workers currently receive from the 21 Teamster multiemployer plans that cover UPS employees, Mr. Skillman said.

    The group needs 30% of the Teamster-represented UPS employees to sign the cards in order to ask the National Labor Relations Board, Washington, to hold an election to determine which union will be certified as the labor representative at UPS, Mr. Skillman said. APWA officials hope to complete the petition signing in 60 days.

    The APWA seeks to become the collective bargaining union for parcel-service workers at UPS, based in Atlanta, Mr. Skillman said. Some 12,000 Teamsters at UPS joined the APWA, paying its $150 per person initiation fee, Mr. Skillman said.

    Gail Moran, assistant to the regional director at the NLRB, said, “It’s not usual you have more than one union representing the same classification of works at the same company,” But she said she couldn’t say if that’s the case with the UPS workers.

    The current Teamsters contract with UPS expires in 2008.

    Galen Munroe, Teamsters press secretary, said in a statement, “We don’t believe that the APWA is a legitimate labor union, they have no filings with the Department of Labor and they have never negotiated any contracts.”

    The three largest of the 21 Teamsters pension funds covering UPS employees have more than $50 billion in assets: the $30.2 billion Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust Fund, Seattle; $20.7 billion Central States, Southeast and Southwestern Areas Pension Fund, Rosemont, Ill.; and $3.4 billion New England Teamsters and Trucking Industry Pension Fund, Burlington, Mass., Officials from the three funds couldn’t be reached for comment. The total assets of the other 18 plans wasn’t available.

    UPS Teamster employees represent various proportions of the participants in 21 Teamster multiemployer funds. UPS contributed $1.289 billion in 2005 to multiemployer funds, according to its most recent 10-K report filed in 2006. “The vast, vast majority of it” went to Teamster pension funds, said Norman Black, UPS spokesman; he didn’t have an exact figure.

    Mr. Black declined to comment on the APWA effort, saying UPS isn’t involved in its employees’ choice of union representation.

    UPS and the Teamsters opened negotiations on a new contract in September to discuss exclusively pension and health-care issues, Mr. Black said. He said the opening of talks was unusually early for the contract that wasn’t expiring for almost two years because both sides recognize how difficult it is to settle the two issues.

    UPS wants negotiators to consider all ideas regarding the structure of the union’s pension plans, Mr. Black said, although he wouldn’t elaborate. Mr. Black said UPS is concerned about severe underfunding of some of the Teamster plans; the use of UPS contributions to subside pensions of people who have worked for other companies that went out of business and no longer contribute into the Teamster plans; and disparate pension benefits at different Teamster funds for the same UPS work and length of service. Mr. Black would not specify which Teamsters plans UPS considers most troubling in terms of funding level.

    The Central States plan is 60.5% funded as of Nov. 1, 2005, according to a Teamsters November 2006 report. To improve funding, the plan is seeking to increase contributions for each renewal period.

    Western Conference reported its plan no longer had an unfunded liability as of 2006 and “this means there is no withdrawal liability for employers who withdraw from the plan in 2006,” it said in a report.

    The Western Conference plan’s “investment performance remains stellar, ranking in the sixth percentile of Taft-Hartley trusts over the past 10 years, as measured by the Wilshire Cooperative Universe, the report said.

    Mr. Black said UPS proposed in 1997 contract negotiations that workers could withdraw from Teamster plans and UPS would create a new pension plan for its Teamster employees, but the Teamsters opposed the idea and UPS didn’t pursue it, Mr. Black said. A UPS spokeswoman at that time said the proposal would increase pension benefits for Teamster members by 50%. The Teamsters’ Mr. Munroe would not comment on the 1997 UPS offer.

    Teamsters Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund reported a 14.45% preliminary return for 2006, according to a report filed in U.S. District Court in Chicago under a court-supervised consent decree with the Department of Labor dating to the 1970s. The fund had $20.7 billion in assets as of last Dec. 31, the report said.

    Mr. Skillman said he believes the APWA could improve pensions in part by taking the UPS employees out of the costly Teamster funds and making management under the APWA more transparent. He said details about the management of the Teamsters funds is difficult to obtain. He said some of the Teamsters funds, especially the Central States, have underperformed.

    Jack Marco, chairman of Marco Consulting Group, Chicago, which specializes in consulting to jointly trusteed plans, said the decline of contributing employers in Teamster funds puts more burden on UPS to subsidize benefits of non-UPS employees. But he said it an “an industry problem, not a pension problem” with other companies going out of the trucking business.

    “If these employers stayed in business, you’d have a healthy pension fund,” Mr. Marco said. “UPS is stuck with the bill for these guys.

    “I think for all employers in the fund, it is a rotten deal some employers went out of business and didn’t pay their (pension) bill,” Mr. Marco said. “Employers have a legitimate gripe.”

    Mr. Marco said the disparity in pensions among UPS employees depending to which Teamster they belong “is not ideal.” “Unfortunately, that is the way the world evolved,” he said. “If’ there was one plan for everyone, then it could be fairer.”

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    3

    Default UPS drivers maneuvering to create a new union

    UPS drivers maneuvering to create a new union
    By Thomas Gnau
    Dayton Daily News
    Saturday, May 19, 2007

    DAYTON — — A group of United Parcel Service drivers are maneuvering to exit the International Brotherhood of Teamsters and create a new union.

    Drivers like Rick Ford, who drives a semi to Chicago each night from West Carrollton, is an organizer for a union branding itself the Association of Parcel Workers of America.

    For Ford, 48, the impetus to leave the Teamsters comes down to what he contends is a faulty pension system — the Central States Fund. If he retired tomorrow, Ford says he would receive nothing, though he has been an UPS driver for 29 years.

    Ford will have to wait until he is 65 before retiring, said Van Skillman, APWA president and organizer.

    With APWA, Ford says, "No. 1, the money you have going toward your pension, you're going to get 100 percent, almost 100 percent, of your money."

    But there are other issues at work, APWA organizers say.

    It's also about medical insurance, which is less of an issue in Ohio, where UPS provides generous health insurance, said Skillman, 50, a 28-year UPS driver based in Greensboro, N.C.

    APWA supporters challenge the quality of Teamsters representation.

    Messages were left for a Teamsters spokesman in Washington, D.C. and an officer of Teamsters Local 957, Ford's union.

    Ford, an APWA organizer since March 2005, says driver signatures for union organization cards have been collected in 29 states.

    Ford declined to say how many signatures he has locally, but he said 75 percent of drivers at the UPS depot in West Carrollton have signed cards, as well 85 percent of Dayton-based drivers. Ninety-five percent of drivers have signed up in both Springfield and Hamilton, he said.

    Skillman thinks a National Labor Relations Board-overseen election will be held this fall, perhaps in September or October.

    "We didn't really understand the amount of support we had until we started getting these cards signed," Skillman said.

    The drive seems to have gotten notice. This week, UPS said it is willing to jointly manage a new pension plan with the Teamsters as a way to leave the Central States Fund, the (Louisville) Courier-Journal reported. UPS has a national sorting hub in Louisville.

    "It's pretty obvious that Atlanta (UPS corporate headquarters) has finally done its homework," Skillman said. "The company has nothing to say about this organizing drive or anything about the Teamsters," said Norman Black, a UPS spokesman in Atlanta. "Our employees make their own decisions about union representation."

    1. Sponsored Links
       

Similar Threads

  1. Collective Bargaining: No Union Company Possibly Going Union
    By independent in forum Employment and Labor
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 03-01-2009, 04:18 PM
  2. Canadian Seeks Green Card
    By lunacat16 in forum Visas for Business, Tourism and Family
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 07-19-2008, 09:01 PM
  3. Unemployment Benefits: Unemployment Seeks Reimbursement In Pennsylvania
    By qnkelly in forum Employment and Labor
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 02-21-2008, 10:39 AM
  4. Emancipation: 16 Year Old In Kentucky Seeks Emancipation
    By AlYSAxlYNN in forum Juvenile Law
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 01-16-2008, 07:35 PM
  5. Emancipation: Niece Seeks Emancipation
    By helpjenhelp in forum Juvenile Law
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 01-14-2008, 11:13 PM
 
 
Sponsored Links

Legal Help, Information and Resources