we don't understand the court decision either. this "road is basically a 10 ft driveway. the portion that runs thru my property is just 2 dirt ruts. not even a dirt road, not then, not now. in the court decision, there is no mention of upkeep. it is our opinion that the judge kinda went too far, and assigned the intention of providing access for property owners to the "public, not looking at the inevitable population growth, and increased traffic.

