Thank you Carl, it all makes sense now as far as the code shuffleings go. How can otain if and how or when he was accused of this? This is surely something my mother would have brought up if she knew. And how could he avoid jail time if he in fact did molest a child? What does annoy signify anyways? I'm just trying to get a better understanding of this whole mess and you great people are the only thing giving me a peace of mind. On another note on the Megan's law website, it says section code formerly 647(a) which would mean the old version-"Who solicits anyone to engage in or who engages in lewd or dissolute conduct in any public place or in any place open to the public or exposed to public view." Not the current version-"to annoy or molest children" so if he was convicted of the previous code and not the current, how do I go about getting it corrected? If I can.

