Results 1 to 7 of 7

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Posts
    8,238

    Default Re: Whistleblowing on an Employer

    I’m going to guess that CQC refer’s to the United Kingdom’s Care Quality Commission, a UK government agency that monitors, inspects and regulates health and social care services. One of the areas it regulates is care homes, which I’m guessing is the category the residental home falls into. The CQC allows persons to make anonymous whistleblowing reports and also has a policy of not disclosing the identity of whistleblowers unless legally required to do so. So your employer ordinarily should not know if you made a report to the CQC. But if the employer does find out, it is not clear if UK law prohibits the employer from retaliating against you for it. I note that in the CQC whistleblowing publication there is no mention of any such prohibition and I would think if there was one the CQC would point it out to encourage whistleblowing reports. But I know little of UK law on this, and this site addresses U.S. law. So if you are in the U.K. then I suggest you find a web site that deals with U.K. legal issues for more information.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    3

    Default Re: Whistleblowing on an Employer

    i'm sorry, yes it is in the UK. I did not realise that this forum only covered the USA. The answer I was seeking was about weather my signature was valid due to signing under duress, Once again I apologise. I cannot find a site like this in the UK

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Massachusetts
    Posts
    24,521

    Default Re: Whistleblowing on an Employer


  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    3

    Default Re: Whistleblowing on an Employer

    Thank you I have registered on this site

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Posts
    8,238

    Default Re: Whistleblowing on an Employer

    Quote Quoting Dian Lawrence
    View Post
    The answer I was seeking was about weather my signature was valid due to signing under duress.
    I think it is likely that on this point the law in the U.S. and U.K. is probably similar since the concept of duress comes from the common law, though I will not guarantee the U.K is the same. In the U.S. duress refers to the use of some kind physical force, theat of physical force, or other illegal acts or threats to compel someone to do something, such as signing a contract for example. The classic example of duress is putting a gun to the person’s head and telling him to sign the document or he’ll be shot. The use of legal pressure is not duress. Thus, generally speaking, the threat by an employer that an employee will be fired if he does not sign something would not be duress since for the most part a threat to fire an employee is perfectly legal. In that circumstance, while the employee might well fear loss of his job and feel compelled to sign to avoid getting fired, it is still not duress.

    1. Sponsored Links
       

Similar Threads

  1. Background Checks: Should a Former Employer Report Résumé Fraud to a New Employer
    By JACH in forum Employment and Labor
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 06-28-2015, 05:45 PM
  2. Background Checks: Present Employer Disclosed to Potential Employer of Job Acceptance with Other Company
    By imanurse2010 in forum Employment and Labor
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 08-26-2013, 06:32 PM
  3. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 12-03-2010, 11:06 PM
  4. Compensation and Overtime: Payments Withheld by Previous Employer and Employer No Longer Communicating
    By SP22403 in forum Employment and Labor
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 09-10-2009, 11:02 AM
  5. Injured in Iraq for Whistleblowing
    By Barry in forum Employment and Labor
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 07-01-2007, 08:06 AM
 
 
Sponsored Links

Legal Help, Information and Resources