Accused of Wrongly Taking Items from a School After Resigning

[cbg]

Fine. Show me the law that says that any pictures taken by the OP belong to her unless she is reimbursed by the school. Put your money where your mouth is, or shut it.

I'll wait. But I won't hold my breath.

[RechaeT]

Also to mention these pictures are also required to be printed and taken with the schools technology, however the school did not have any of that so I had to use my things

[eerelations]

Also to mention these pictures are also required to be printed and taken with the schools technology, however the school did not have any of that so I had to use my things

This has been answered already. The photos belong to the school.

[jk]

This has been answered already. The photos belong to the school.

I still don't see where you come up with that.

Even if one wants to argue it was within ops scope of work, which is unlikely, at most it would mean school owned the copyrights. There really is nothing here proving school or op owns the prints. There is big difference between ownership of
the copyrights and ownership of the prints. Op has not provided enough info to determine who owns the prints.

But again, regardless, it's foolish to fight to retain something you admitted you don't want and it is causing you problems.

[TechWorker]

so "defeating" A former employer in court for some unlentioned reason and you're Perry Frickin' Mason? Your statement in itself is meaningless.

Defeating a former employer does not mean I'm Perry Mason. But it does mean that I know SOMETHING about employment law. I was responding to someone who said that I know nothing at all about employment law, which is clearly not the case.

[cbg]

You know nothing about the employment law that is applicable in this thread. That has been proven by your incorrect statements about it. As for the rest - well, time will tell. You certainly haven't shown any evidence of it yet.