Quote Quoting jmr121372
View Post
Just because the judge don't see eye to eye on different subjects don't mean that I have evidence of these threats. I have a four camera DVR to whereas I had them setup outside my place and I caught him making threats and harassing me when Florida State Statute 83.52(7) clearly states "Conduct himself or herself, and require other persons on the premises with his or her consent to conduct themselves, in a manner that does not unreasonably disturb the tenant’s neighbors or constitute a breach of the peace." Which IF the landlord don't want ANY lawsuit, then he just might want to keep the peace between; as you put it 'bickering neighbors'. But, since the landlord DID NOT keep the peace between 'bickering neighbors', then I can AND will use Florida State Statute 83.52(7) against the landlord for NOT keeping the peace and the judge will see this evidence and he/she will rule based on everything including the evidence.
Florida's wiretapping law is a "two-party consent" law. Florida makes it a crime to intercept or record a "wire, oral, or electronic communication" in Florida, unless all parties to the communication consent. See Fla. Stat. ch. 934.03. Florida law makes an exception for in-person communications when the parties do not have a reasonable expectation of privacy in the conversation, such as when they are engaged in conversation in a public place where they might reasonably be overheard. If you are operating in Florida, you may record these kinds of in-person conversations without breaking the law. However, you should always get the consent of all parties before recording any telephone conversation and any in-person that common sense tells you is private.

In addition to subjecting you to criminal prosecution, violating the Florida wiretapping law can expose you to a civil lawsuit for damages by an injured party.