Results 1 to 10 of 14

Hybrid View

  1. #1

    Default Discovery demand was not recieved 14 days prior in Washington

    I have a court date next week for a speeding ticket (in Washington State). I mailed out certified letters to the court and to the PA last month to request discovery. The court's letter arrived in time. However, the one to the PA was late.

    I just recieved a letter from the prosecutor stating that:
    "... State of Wa... hereby submits that the defendant's discovery request was not timely recieved pursuant to IRLJ 3.1. The State received the discovery demand on 2/2/2007, which was not 14 days before the sheduled hearing set for 2/15/2007, pursuant to IRLJ 3.1
    The State requests any motion to dismiss... be denied, if the basis of the defendant's request is that the State failed to provide discovery seven days prior to the contested hearing date."


    My questions:
    Are they still going to send me the discovery?
    IF they don't send it at all, can I still motion for dismissal somehow?

    Is there anything else I can do? Thanks for your help.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    3,577

    Default Re: WA - Discovery demand was not recieved 14 days prior

    IRLJ 3.1(b) reads (in part):
    If the prosecuting authority, without reasonable excuse or justification, fails to provide the citing officer's sworn statement, the statement shall be suppressed.
    IMHO the fact that your discovery request was not received until 13 days before the hearing, does not constitute a "reasonable excuse" for not providing the officer's sworn statement AT ALL. If the officer's statement is not forthcoming, I'd move for dismissal based on the sentence I've quoted above.

    Good luck,
    Barry

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Arkansas
    Posts
    643

    Default Re: Discovery demand was not recieved 14 days prior in Washington

    I think they are trying to head off a motion to dismiss or suppress for non-compliance with discovery, in effect saying because you did not follow the discovery rules you should not be able to have any sanctions imposed.

    Courts usually enjoy considerable discretion over discovery matters and dismissal or suppression of evidence are extreme remedies which, in my experience, are seldom imposed.

    My sense is that they will furnish you discovery--of course you must receive it in time to make meaningul use of it. You can always move for any sanction you feel is warranted, including a dismissal or suppression of evidence, and let the judge make a ruling on your motion. Normally, when discovery materials are not timely furnished, the result is that the case ends up being continued to a future date.

  4. #4

    Default Re: Discovery demand was not recieved 14 days prior in Washington

    Thank you both for replying.
    Quote Quoting Litigator
    View Post
    My sense is that they will furnish you discovery--
    You were right, I received discovery in the mail today, 6 days prior to the hearing. It was filled with "objections" to my requests for discovery. Yet it did include:
    1. The speeding ticket (front side only, I asked for front and back),
    2. The Officer's Notes
    3. Affidavit of Certification Concerning Design and Construction of electronic SMD pursuant to IRLJ 6.6


    I think the only other defense strategy I've heard of is to call the court and check the filing date on the ticket. What else can I do?


    Here's a long shot I was thinking about: I have USPS certified proof that the letter was delivered at 9:06 AM on February 2, 2007. The Hearing is scheduled for 1:15 PM on 02-15-07. Since they had it for most of the day on the 2nd, isn't that day counted as a full day?

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    3,577

    Default Re: Discovery demand was not recieved 14 days prior in Washington

    First, in WA the backside of the tickets are, indeed, the officer's notes. The back usually includes checkboxes for SMD, LIDAR, etc.; Serial Number of SMD and tuning fork; Clear and Steady Tone YES/NO; Other vehicles in beam YES/NO; and so on. There is also space for the officer to write down any other information he/she deems necessary.

    And according to IRLJ 3.1, that's all you're entitled to.

    The filing date should appear on the front of the copy they just sent you -- look for a date/time stamp.

    As far as having received the letter on Feb 2, IRLJ 3.1 states (in part)
    Upon written demand of the defendant at least 14 days before a contested hearing, filed with the court and served on the office of the prosecuting authority assigned to the court in which the infraction is filed....
    "14 days before" means go to the calendar, find Feb 15, count backwards 14 days. You needed to file and serve the request on the 1st.

    Check the information in the officer's notes. You didn't indicate whether you subpoenaed the officer or not. If not, there needs to be information in the notes concerning the officer's location, fixed or moving, direction, etc. Anything not listed in the notes creates a potential lack of evidence. But, this is a pretty long shot.

    My advice -- ask for deferred findings, if you're eligible.

    Good luck,
    Barry

  6. #6

    Default Re: Discovery demand was not recieved 14 days prior in Washington

    Thanks Barry.

    I'll have to research to find out what makes one eligible. I haven't had a ticket in WA for over 3 years.

    When asking for deferred findings, is that done at the hearing? What might one say to the judge?

    I could not find a filing date on the copy of the ticket. There is a stamp from the PA dated for 2 days ago. There is a big round black dot. There is a handwritten "6/2" on the ticket. But there is no filing date as far as I can tell.
    Perhaps it is hidden under the big black dot?

    Thanks again for all your help!

    1. Sponsored Links
       

Similar Threads

  1. Hearings and Trials: Received Discovery Demand 10 Days Prior to Hearing
    By KJordan714 in forum Moving Violations, Parking and Traffic Tickets
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 01-16-2011, 10:30 AM
  2. Discovery: No Discovery Recieved, Court Date Tomorrow
    By Jetes in forum Moving Violations, Parking and Traffic Tickets
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 04-28-2010, 01:57 AM
  3. Discovery: Discovery Not Received 7 Days Prior in Washington State
    By pande in forum Moving Violations, Parking and Traffic Tickets
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 04-10-2010, 02:15 PM
  4. Speeding Tickets: Discovery Received Late (Less Than 7 Days) in Washington
    By mich in forum Moving Violations, Parking and Traffic Tickets
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 09-23-2009, 08:50 PM
  5. Retail Fraud / Shoplifting: Have Not Recieved Civil Demand
    By help.confused in forum Criminal Charges
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 07-02-2008, 05:20 AM
 
 
Sponsored Links

Legal Help, Information and Resources