Quote Quoting jk
View Post
Criminal courts often impose TRO's in conjunction with the filing of a domestic
violence compliant. That is why I asked who issued it. It is not likely that tro would be dismissed until the criminal charges are dealt with. TRO are dismissed or made final during a final FRO hearing regardless of the criminal charges pending. Criminal charges are not filed based only on a TRO request. The prosecutor files charges and it is only upon a review of the facts at hand and determining there is a valid basis for
filing charges. Actually the TRO and the arrest warrant was issued the same day, June 21st. An arrest warrant is issued only by the courts after being presented probable cause in the request for the warrant. If this is what you believe should have happened I agree but this is not what happened in my case. Have you checked the court docket records to be certain the warrant was issued on jun 21? . Yes I have and it was. Regardless, you were given notice of the warrant when you were arrested. I was arrested and notified of the warrant after the charges were dismissed on September 20th, I would think I should have been given notice by the sheriff whom initially served me with the TRO or my the NJ Family Court judge who heard the case regarding the TRO or by the judge who dismissed the charges. That is when most people discover there is a warrant for
their arrest. But normally I am sure they have not been to court on several different occasions prior to the notification and had the charges dismissed.

whether you were ticketed or charged when pulled over is irrelevant as long as the cop had reasonable suspicion of a crime. I only added this part because you implied that I was doing something or that there were additional charges earlier. That gives them a legal basis to stop you. I suspect the stuff hanging from your mirror constituted a crime (obstructed view is often the issue caused)
I was ok with being stopped for the objects hanging from my mirror, I have no issues with the arresting officers, they were simply doing there jobs.

Are you familiar with TRO or FRO laws in NJ? Or how it works? TRO's are issued based on one persons testimony, so they are fairly easy to obtain. FRO's are issued based on preponderance of the evidence and not based on the notion that you have to be found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt as in the case criminal charges. This is why the criminal charges in these matters are normally separated. Also an FRO can be granted and a person not be found guilty of the criminal charges and vice versa.

How is it lawful to arrest me based on a mistake made by the court system and then when presented with evidence saying the case was dismissed to continue to book me as if I am still a suspect in a crime. Its an egregious and negligent on the part of the courts and has to be in violation of my rights. I am looking for case law which supports this. Double Jeopardy does not apply because the case never went to trial. I know that the according to 18 USC 1983, municipalities can be sued.