Doesn't the bold sentencing provide that I agree to the overseas travel first?
Would it be incorrect to interpret the paragraph to mean that once I agree to the international travel, I cannot just deny providing the documentation needed for such travel?
Example: Sure, you can leave the country with our daughter, but I am not going to give you her passport.
I believe this is the situation the bold language is trying to avoid.
If the intent of the whole clause is to mean that either parent must agree to the other parents international travel with the child, it could have been written differently. No?
Oh I have valid reasons.
She wants to go to Latin America.
Zika virus. High crime rates. Risk of kidnapping. There is plenty.

