Nothing about that gives you any claim to sue the police, the 911 dispatcher, or anyone else in the county government. Whether it was a miscommunication or whatever, the reason for the officer going out there doesn’t matter. The police are allowed to come out and investigate complaints that they receive. They do not have to honor your request to call first or to come only at a time you want them to come. None of the things the 911 dispatch or what the sheriff’s deputy did here was a violation of any of your civil rights.
Your landlord may evict you if you have failed to pay the rent, have in some other way materially breached the lease, or the lease has been terminated and you are a holdover tenant (i.e. you stayed past the termination date). The landlord may not evict you only because you called the police and an officer came out to you home. So it matters a great deal what reason the landlord provided for the eviction. If the landlord has a legitimate reason for eviction and proves it to the court then none of this stuff about the officer coming to your home makes any difference. I can’t really tell from what you said here what the landlord specifically said was the reason for eviction. All you said was something about him asking you to install something, which you did, then you were asked to remove that same thing and the landlord complains you didn’t do it. That’s kind of vague and doesn’t really tell me what the basis was for the eviction. In any event, to avoid eviction you either need to rebut the reason the landlord gives for the eviction or find some serious error that the landlord made in following the eviction process. None of this really involves that visit from the officer, and I think your focus on that is diverting your attention from the real issues at hand.

