Results 1 to 10 of 23

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Posts
    18

    Default Destruction of Drug Paraphernalia by a Police Officer

    My question involves personal property located in the State of: New Mexico.

    Odd question, but some background first.
    I was a police officer assigned to the property room. One of the cases involved a large quantity of hydroponic equipment that had been used to grow marijuana. As the case was concluded I told the case agent that I would be destroying the equipment as it met the definition of drug paraphernalia. He said to return it. I said hell no. My immediate supervisor told me to destroy it, so I did.
    I wrote a standard destruction order, had it approved by the city attorney and then dropped it off at the district court. got it back a few days later, signed by a judge, then destroyed all the paraphernalia as i had done in the past, more times than I can remember.
    Case agent went apes**t and made a formal complaint. Long story short the Department of Public Safety (DPS), made up of members of the Attorney Generals Office, exonerated me and said the case agent gave me an illegal order and confirmed that it was drug paraphernalia and could not be returned.
    Now it gets interesting.
    The chief of police sent the DPS a letter objecting to their findings and telling them that as far as he was concerned it wasn't drug paraphernalia he then accusing me of criminal damage to property, deceit, having low intelligence and being unable to read and interpret the statutes.
    So my question is this.
    If a judge has signed a destruction order, who is the owner of the property from that moment forwards?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Posts
    8,238

    Default Re: Court Order

    Quote Quoting NMNeil
    View Post
    So my question is this.
    If a judge has signed a destruction order, who is the owner of the property from that moment forwards?
    One would have to read the specific order to answer the question. Note that the property, while seized, still belongs to the defendant who owned it prior to seizure unless a court determines otherwise. Even an order of destruction does not necessarily change who the owner of the property is. It merely says that that person’s property is to be destroyed. Why does it matter in your situation who owns it?

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Posts
    18

    Default Re: Court Order

    Quote Quoting Taxing Matters
    View Post
    One would have to read the specific order to answer the question. Note that the property, while seized, still belongs to the defendant who owned it prior to seizure unless a court determines otherwise. Even an order of destruction does not necessarily change who the owner of the property is. It merely says that that person’s property is to be destroyed. Why does it matter in your situation who owns it?
    The problem is that New Mexico has two laws that apparently contradict one another.

    29-1-14. Unclaimed property; authority to sell; notice of sale; deadly weapons, controlled substances and other contraband excepted.

    H. This section shall not apply to deadly weapons or items of significant historical value, poisons, controlled substances or other contraband lawfully seized as evidence for the prosecution of a violation of statute or ordinance or which has otherwise come into the lawful possession of a state, county or municipal law enforcement agency and has been in possession for more than ninety days. Once it is determined by the law enforcement agency that any property enumerated in this subsection is no longer necessary for use in obtaining a conviction or is not needed for any other public purpose, the law enforcement agency may apply to the district court, ex parte and without notice, for an order authorizing destruction or other disposition of the property; provided that a state, county or municipal law enforcement agency shall allow state museums access to agency inventory records for the purpose of inspecting and selecting firearms that are appropriate to state museum firearm collections. The court shall grant the application if the proposed destruction or disposition is in the best interest of the public safety and welfare.

    And

    30-15-1. Criminal damage to property.

    Criminal damage to property consists of intentionally damaging any real or personal property of another without the consent of the owner of the property.

    Whoever commits criminal damage to property is guilty of a petty misdemeanor, except that when the damage to the property amounts to more than one thousand dollars ($1,000) he is guilty of a fourth degree felony.

    Now the chief of police is saying that I committed the offense of criminal damage because I didn't own the property

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    7,056

    Default Re: Court Order

    There is another statute that you have to consider. 31-27-1 "Forfeiture Act" I can't seem to find the statute in its entirety but did find where the legislature was amending the law in 2015.

    http://www.nmlegis.gov/Sessions/15%2...se/HB0560.html

    Was the defendant found guilty?

    Hydroponic growing equipment is not by itself drug paraphernalia.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Posts
    18

    Default Re: Court Order

    He plead no contest and has served his sentence.
    I have already checked the NM and USC forfeiture laws but they only seem to apply to the fruits of a crime, not contraband.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    7,056

    Default Re: Court Order

    Under this statute, the hydroponic equipment would be considered paraphernalia:


    30-31-25.1. Possession, delivery or manufacture of drug paraphernalia prohibited; exceptions.


    A. It is unlawful for a person to use or possess with intent to use drug paraphernalia to plant, propagate, cultivate, grow, harvest, manufacture, compound, convert, produce, process, prepare, test, analyze, pack, repack, store, contain, conceal, inject, ingest, inhale or otherwise introduce into the human body a controlled substance in violation of the Controlled Substances Act.

    1. Sponsored Links
       

Similar Threads

  1. Background Checks: Finding a Job as a Police Officer With a Felony Drug Conviction
    By Homicide99 in forum Employment and Labor
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 02-24-2016, 07:04 PM
  2. Background Checks: Will a Juvenile Drug Record Keep You From Becoming a Police Officer
    By CJP in forum Employment and Labor
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 01-03-2016, 04:31 PM
  3. Paraphernalia: Pulled Over by the Police, Drug Paraphernalia Was Taken
    By weliveinawheel in forum Criminal Charges
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 03-15-2015, 09:09 AM
  4. Background Checks: Becoming a Police Officer With a Drug and Criminal Record
    By MissMae417 in forum Employment and Labor
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 11-15-2013, 07:04 PM
  5. Paraphernalia: Drug Paraphernalia Found in Car After Police Stop, Search
    By ShaneWilkinson in forum Criminal Charges
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 06-21-2011, 11:39 AM
 
 
Sponsored Links

Legal Help, Information and Resources