First:

When I went to do the psych/substance eval, the therapist said she didn't find any mental health problems. She asked about drinking and drug use. I told her I had drank two beers the night before. She said, and I quote, "Because you told me you drank two beers last night, I am diagnosing you with a substance abuse problem." I said, "Well, I guess you have to diagnose me with something, right? I'll go get a second opinion. We're done here." I paid the receptionist, and stepped outside awaiting a receipt. The therapist came out after several minutes, gave me back my money, and said, "Look, I just don't have enough information from DSS about this. I can't give a professional opinion anyway." Come to find out, this lady had done this before to other people
But then

I did not throw a "temper tantrum" with the shrink. I said, "I guess you gotta give me something here. I don't agree with you. I am going to get a second opinion." The therapist in question has done this before-hand out some diagnosis so she can get paid. She didn't refund my money because I threw a fit. She refunded my money because she got caught. The totality of my recorded substance use is getting caught in my early twenties with a little weed on me. I'm not sitting here stoned out of my mind or blasted drunk. I probably should have just lied to the therapist and said "oh, no, I'm a teetotaler."
The tone of one is quite, quite different from that of the other. Which one is true?