I am posting here to discuss the issues.

In this alternative, there is an arrest for felony cultivation and possession of marijuana with intent to sell. The arrestee had a valid pot recommendation at the time and was honest with police about intending to engage in this controversial form of Commerce since Prop215 should secure those natural and civil rights, regardless of any criminal statutes to the contrary.

Police seized and destroyed a "pre-season" grow (crop) in April of last year proximate; and, the pre-trial procedure prevented a regular season grow (crop) in that same year, which would have been worth more than the pre-season grow (crop).

What would be the actual procedure to recover private property and damages for income lost due to the arrest and pre-trial procedures should the State be unable to convict?

I am hoping for a discussion of these issues. And, there are some elements in this alternative that may be considered "controversial" should anyone want to actually debate.

Thanks in advance.