Thank you for the reply, Searcher.

The copy of the citation that I linked is the copy that I had received and filed with the court when I requested a contested hearing. I will have to confirm with them when they received the officer's copy. If the citation was filed on time is suppression of the radar evidence by hearsay reliable enough to work on its own?

Also, correct me if I am wrong here, but what if there are untruths in the officer's affidavit? It wouldn't be with pursuing if I cannot prove them, right?

The things that he says I said are not what I said. After all the hell I went through to get full custody of my kids in court I have never and would never say that my kids live with my X. I also know for a fact that I did not tell him the reason why my son had gotten into trouble. The only way he could have gotten that information was from someone else.

The officer is the ex-father-in-law to my ex-wife's new husband and grandfather to four of his kids. I'm guessing this is where he got the information as I've had folks from that household ask me about getting pulled over by "grandpa".

- - - Updated - - -

Ok, I just got a copy of the citation from the clerk's office. There was no stamp on it and she said they are filed instantly with the court through the officer's computer.

I'm not sure how strong the motion to suppress is on its own with the officer's statement?

Do any of you feel confident that the motion to suppress and then dismiss for lack of foundation is strong enough on its own?