So a friend of mine got pulled over in NJ and they asked him to do a field sobriety test. He had gotten off of work went home then had to go back to work to get something out of his work truck. Gets pulled over. They ask him to do a field sobriety test. They tell him to count to 30, then told him that he had counted to 90. He says he only counted to 30 and he isn't that stupid. He said he did not fall over but he wasn't very balanced when they made him stand on one leg. So they cuff him and this is what intrigues me the most. They ask him if they can search the vehicle. He says no, they threaten to get dogs but never do. They go in the car with a camera to get his cell phone. Bring him to the station breathalyze him. No alcohol is present. They ask him to take a drug test, he told them that he doesn't want to do that because if he happened to smoke some marijuana or something a day ago he knew it would show up even though he wasn't intoxicated at the moment. I don't think they have a case, the evidence is lacking substance and there is no way to prove the states case, but i would be curious to hear opinions. what do you think?

