How is it Share's fault when she wasn't in contact with the landlord? All communications went to PT, the primary tenant on the lease, who then withheld all information which pertained to the tentative eviction. Share was a fill-in, unaware of any past due rent and any communications warning of such an eviction.
No choice was made by Share to abandon the property. That decision was made by PT when she withheld all of the information. And when she lied about contacting the landlord and her father.
The monetary value on Share's possessions could range quite a bit and seeing as how this situation has caused quite a bit of anguish, I would think there is more to be compensated for than just tangible property, such as pain & suffering. I think a lawyer would know how to determine that better than you or I. Remember, PTD is on the lease with his daughter and it would probably be in his best interest to reimburse Share for her losses as he would be a part of the lawsuit, just like he was summoned to court previously and on all other court documents.
Sifting through a landfill up to three weeks after the landlord could've possibly emptied his unit doesn't seem like a reasonable option.
If you actually want to help find a solution, your responses would've probably looked for more detail in the story so you could then determine an actual course of action. Go back to trolling, guy.

