Can You Revoke a Model Release for Pornographic Images

[Disagreeable]

She would likely have more success changing her hair color, eye brows and makeup to make herself unrecognizable.

[BlitzGS430]

Well I imagine this has been a different subject for discussion. Although not the outcome I was looking for, hopefully we have learned some valuable legal issues ( I know I have ) from this topic.

Thanks for the input all that contributed.

[BlitzGS430]

One question that came up after I thought that we were done with topic. If the model release and or contract is found to be null and void, but an injunction to remove the images from the producer's website seems out of reach. I am guessing that the pursuit of payment for continued use as partners would be out of the question? This is confusing in a way to me because if the model release and or contract were nullified as a result of being an unlawful object; I imagine the request for continued payment for use would be the same as agreeing to a partnership in a unlawful act ( pornography in Arizona ). am I very far off with this assumption?

[Disagreeable]

We cannot read the contract.

[Mr. Knowitall]

If the contract is upheld, compensation is set by the contract. If the contract is set aside, you would want the pictures removed. As the parties have already negotiated what they deemed to be fair compensation, trying to shake down the producers for more money does not seem like a great strategy.

[BlitzGS430]

Makes sense...I was just curious about that aspect of the " contract ". Thanks