I can actually see Dad making stepDad's email a huge issue. And he'd have a valid point.
I can actually see Dad making stepDad's email a huge issue. And he'd have a valid point.
Truthfully, mom needs to man up and actually deal with her ex. Her husband is overstepping majorly. And if she can't cope with him, she needs counseling so that she can.
Oh, wow, welcome to the party.
Conversations with the ex usually end up with him screaming at me in front of the children. Not good. And my counselor has advised that my husband supply the communication in order to keep my ex from getting a reaction out of me. Nobody objects, least of all my ex, who actually co-parents better with my husband than with me. You can't fix stupid, you can only avoid the elevated blood pressure and heart palpitations. I have problems enough with work, school, and family -- I don't need my ex making a scene every time I attempt to have a conversation with him. All our communication goes through OFW, so please, don't assume that my husband is overstepping. This is a snapshot of the crap I go through on a constant basis, with someone who is supposed to love his kids, but bitches about child support when I'm a student and he's making six figures, owns a rental property or three and welches on the smallest of purchases for his children.
Be helpful or be silent - you know not what I am trying to correct.
YOur husband is OVERSTEPPING. He should not be in the middle of this. You should not be allowing that. And quite frankly, I have gotten court orders prohibiting stepparents from being involved in any communication about the children. Maybe you should be working INSTEAD of going to school. Going to school is a luxury. Your children need to eat.
Maybe you should grow up and learn to cope with the situation. You slept with this man several times. Furthermore, you said your sainted husband emailed dad:
You should have had the good common sense to contact dad on OFW. Not your husband. PER OUR PARENT TEACHER CONFERENCE? Really? He is NOT the children's father. HE did not have a parent teacher conference with your ex's children's teacher(s) -- or should not have. If you don't understand how that is overstepping and can seriously hurt you, then you have a lot to learn." We had been further talking about XXX's "How cars work" project that I did with XXX, and how the teacher thought it was really good (per our parent-teacher conference). XXX interjected with how XXX knows how trunks work since you locked (them) in yours. This of course raised serious concern as I am sure you can understand due to the danger should something go wrong or stop functioning, as well as indicating to them that getting closed in a trunk is a good idea".
As for what you are trying to correct, start with correcting yourself and your own reactions. Then man up and use OFW. Don't let your husband handle EMAIL for crying out loud.
My guess is mom is heading towards an order where communication is going to cease between dad and step dad. And if the anxiety is as debilitating as mom claims, that's not going to bode well for custody issues.
I would venture to guess that if the child was in danger or scared of being in the trunk, it wouldn't have came out as an aside to discussing how a car works with step dad. And playing mediator every once in a while is one thing, having ALL communication go between dad and step dad is a bit much.
Did you miss this part:
My husband, the kid's stepdad, is the one who runs interference between my ex and me. My ex stresses me out to the point of anxiety attacks and everyone involved -- psychologists, counselors, attorneys, and my ex -- all seem to think that my husband dealing with my ex is better for everyone
That is my guess but she doesn't like me saying that. Why? I should be helpful or be silent. I was being helpful. She just doesn't like getting told she needs to deal with the man who fathered her children and learn how to deal with him. Getting a no-third party interference order prohibiting stepdad from opening his trap, typing emails or going to parent-teacher conferences wouldn't be that difficult in several courts in which I work. I have gotten them easily based on what MOM has stated in this thread. But I should just hush. Oh well.
- - - Updated - - -
Did you read the email? I am not the only one who thinks that stepdad overstepped on it. And that dad can make an issue of it.
Oh, I do not disagree that stepdad's email was worded very poorly. However, it looks like pretty much everybody has said that stepdad should be the one communicating with dad, including dad and apparently dad's attorney, so I do not think that we can fault him for the communicating with dad, but rather fault him for doing a poor job of it with that email.
Allow me the luxury of clarifying a few things.
All communication, unless it is from the school district, goes through OFW. Court ordered. The parent-teacher conferences were done per conference call as I was away on a business trip, and my husband and my ex's wife often attend parent teacher conferences. No one has a problem with it. We occasionally text quick questions -- "have tried calling the kids, please have them call me" -- type of thing.
As for a no-third party interference order -- that would cut both ways. I have ample evidence to support the simple fact that my ex behaves better when my husband deals with him. I have tried these last five years to have a cordial co-parenting relationship with my ex. It worked well until I remarried. Now it works better for everyone this way. I would much rather deal with my ex directly, but it is not possible. It's not a question of "manning up" because he does not intimidate me.
In any event, I wanted to know how to deal with the kids being locking in a trunk of a 16 year old car, not to defend how we have arranged communication.
But I thank you all for your advice and your crystal-ball analysis regarding how I should live my life.