The only limitation on travel (for a typical person) is you cannot trespass. Other than that you can travel a you want.
Of course you are one of "those" that argues driving, unless engaged in commerce, is travel as you define it. No matter how many times somebody asks, driving is driving and the freedoms associated with travel do not allow one to drive without a license and the vehicle being registered.
If I have the right to travel, and I have a drivers license, how often can you create probable cause of a crime for non moving violations?
As many times as the individual commits a nonmoving violation. Without any facts and what violation the state claims occurred no one can comment any more specifically than that. Instead of using these vague questions, why don’t you try telling us specifically what it is you think you can challenge here?