
Quoting
ilovechicken
I'm pretty sure Chief Justice Roberts dissent rationally disagreed with your statement however, thanks for the thoughts.
- - - Updated - - -
One sheet of paper and state "Not to be executed sequentially". Exactly following the law and showing intent to strictly follow it. In fact print out the law, and say "i am not sequentially wedding said partners".
If they enter in a record one by one, that's their system which i don't care. That didn't make me a bigamist. The claim would i married two people at the SAME EXACT time in one execution. If you're not committing bigamy, then you're not committing a felony; exactly as worded.
Ironically your right though, the ruling does nothing for it other than have the Chief Justice say stuff about how this kinda opens the door, but since "it's not being petitioned" he won't comment on that.
So... **** it, lets petition it.