Quote Quoting Irishred111
View Post
The response/reversal was due to the late filing issue. And the employer did not make a stink about it at all. At this point, I would like to reopen because she did accept the medical reasons and confusion of dates for doctors appointments with the due date of the appeal. I concur that he should have made a stink about it being a late filing.
Ok, the above is good.

Now, just make sure you take it to the right place. I don't know what happens at a "reopening" of a BOR appeal. My state doesn't recoginze the concept, and neither does any other state I know of. However, I read the CT UI website, and sure enough it does give you that as a choice. Hopefully, this isn't an either or choice. I'd hate to see you go for a reopening rather than court, and then find out you went the wrong route, and then lose your chance to go to court if you are even inclined to go that far.

Quote Quoting Irishred111
View Post
He claims that as of April 1, 2014, I was tardy X number of days, but when I submit for past due wages, I submitted records dating back to 2013 showing the tardiness, and he paid me for the dates that could be paid, as they can only go back 2 years from the filing date. So he condoned it. Had I known I needed to bring that as proof that it went back even further than he claims, it may have been no issue at all and never been approved by the Board. I was informed, misinformed actually, that because he misclassified me, I should've been awarded benefits from the word go. They partially paid benefits. I have to locate the letter for the exact verbiage on the reasons they overturned the decision.
This is garbage. It has NOTHING to do with why you are not getting benefits. Submitting more evidence on your tardiness at work had nothing to do it with why your appeal REQUEST was late.