
Quoting
Irishred111
The Board of Review claimed that I did not have sufficient reasoning for filing the claim late and they reversed the referee's decision and also wrote "The claimant's appeal to the referee is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction." How is that possible? How can the referee have lack of jurisdiction?
I then received a second letter stating that they reviewed the tape from the hearing, which why they didn't do so in the first place is beyond me. The reasoning was the same, but the jurisdiction thing is baffling to me. But in NEITHER of the letters that the Board of Review sent did they mention anything about the misclassification.