
Quoting
donzoh1
You're factually guilty and that will be proven at TBD and at Trial de Novo, assuming the officer responds and shows up. Your statement about a "rolling stop" is enough by itself. If that's the only thing the officer can recall from the event, you're toast.
However, if it's not in the officer's notes, they might forget you said that by the time trial comes around. He might have it in other notes, but I doubt it. At trial, if he can't say he has an independent recollection, he should be limited to just the notes you already have. And, after TBD, you'll be able to see his actual written statement.
The possibility that the officer will forget something is a good reason to delay arraignment (posting of bail) and to delay due dates and appearance dates from now until the cows come home. Just be sure to set a calendar alarm so you don't miss any time frames! Some of this delaying can be done online and if not there, by phone or in person. There are also other good reasons to delay and if you do TBD, which I would suggest you do, you really don't have a speedy trial issue on the table anyway, which is the just about the only reason not to delay. Follow this up with more delays if possible and with TDN
Read carefully CRC 4.210 about TBD, paying careful attention to the upper and lower case usage in the phrase "request for trial by written declaration." The capitalized words refer to something totally different than the lower case words.