Results 1 to 6 of 6

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Posts
    5

    Default Re: Fingerprinted for Employment, Can It Be Tied Back to Previous Shoplifting Occuren

    Thank you for your response.

    I was not fingerprinted when I was caught, as I was cited and released. Though, I fully expect it will come up on the background check, which is why I disclosed it to the employer.

    I definitely wasn't large scale, or a part of any kind of ring, but your mind sure thinks up crazy things when you have a guilty conscience!

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Posts
    1

    Default Re: Fingerprinted for Employment, Can It Be Tied Back to Previous Shoplifting Occuren

    HS 11361.5. (a) Records of any court of this state, any public or private agency that provides services upon referral under Section 1000.2 of the Penal Code, or of any state agency pertaining to the arrest or conviction of any person for a violation of subdivision (b), (c), (d), or (e) of Section 11357 or subdivision (b) of Section 11360, shall not be kept beyond two years from the date of the conviction, or from the date of the arrest if there was no conviction, except with respect to a violation of subdivision (e) of Section 11357 the records shall be retained until the offender attains the age of 18 years at which time the records shall be destroyed as provided in this section. Any court or agency having custody of the records shall provide for the timely destruction of the records in accordance with subdivision (c). The requirements of this subdivision do not apply to records of any conviction occurring prior to January 1, 1976, or records of any arrest not followed by a conviction occurring prior to that date.
    c) Destruction of records of arrest or conviction pursuant to subdivision (a) or (b) shall be accomplished by permanent obliteration of all entries or notations upon the records pertaining to the arrest or conviction, and the record shall be prepared again so that it appears that the arrest or conviction never occurred. However, where (1) the only entries upon the record pertain to the arrest or conviction and (2) the record can be destroyed without necessarily effecting the destruction of other records, then the document constituting the record shall be physically destroyed.

    HS 11361.7. (a) Any record subject to destruction or permanent obliteration pursuant to Section 11361.5, or more than two years of age, or a record of a conviction for an offense specified in subdivision (a) or (b) of Section 11361.5 which became final more than two years previously, shall not be considered to be accurate, relevant, timely, or complete for any purposes by any agency or person. The provisions of this subdivision shall be applicable for purposes of the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. Section 552a) to the fullest extent permissible by law, whenever any information or record subject to destruction or permanent obliteration under Section 11361.5 was obtained by any state agency, local public agency, or any public or private agency that provides services upon referral under Section 1000.2 of the Penal Code, and is thereafter shared with or disseminated to any agency of the federal government. (b) No public agency shall alter, amend, assess, condition, deny, limit, postpone, qualify, revoke, surcharge, or suspend any certificate, franchise, incident, interest, license, opportunity, permit, privilege, right, or title of any person because of an arrest or conviction for an offense specified in subdivision (a) or (b) of Section 11361.5, or because of the facts or events leading to such an arrest or conviction, on or after the date the records of such arrest or conviction are required to be destroyed by subdivision (a) of Section 11361.5, or two years from the date of such conviction or arrest without conviction with respect to arrests and convictions occurring prior to January 1, 1976. As used in this subdivision, "public agency" includes, but is not limited to, any state, county, city and county, city, public or constitutional corporation or entity, district, local or regional political subdivision, or any department, division, bureau, office, board, commission or other agency thereof.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Somewhere near Canada
    Posts
    35,894

    Default Re: Fingerprinted for Employment, Can It Be Tied Back to Previous Shoplifting Occuren

    Are you quoting CA law?

    If so... why?

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    3,666

    Default Re: Fingerprinted for Employment, Can It Be Tied Back to Previous Shoplifting Occuren

    If you didn't steal a tractor trailer load of merchandise or kill someone so you could get away from a store, then don't worry about your prints tying you to anything.

    1. Sponsored Links
       

Similar Threads

  1. Criminal Records: Will a Crime Still Show Up After Completing Diversion on a Background Check
    By angelbabee613 in forum Criminal Records
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 07-14-2013, 01:03 PM
  2. Criminal Investigations: How Often Do the Police Get Good Fingerprints at Crime Scenes
    By aaron0105 in forum Police Investigations
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 11-02-2012, 07:24 AM
  3. Background Checks: Will Past Shoplifting, Not Prosecuted, Show Up in a Background Check
    By vnrgrd in forum Employment and Labor
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 03-05-2012, 08:56 PM
  4. Background Checks: Results of Live Scan Background Check Fingerprints
    By jtr2424 in forum Employment and Labor
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 12-08-2010, 10:06 PM
  5. Prostitution: Prostitution as a Minor Shows Up on Fingerprints Check
    By itsmrsford in forum Criminal Charges
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 11-20-2008, 10:32 PM
 
 
Sponsored Links

Legal Help, Information and Resources