My question involves traffic court in the State of: California
The California v Goldsmith case in 2014 ruled that:
-Police officers issuing tickets based on Red light cameras is not hearsay
-Ticket receiver does not have the constitutional right to face his or her accuser (camera operator)
Does this decision by the California Supreme Court automatically invalidate any arguments that were already decided against by the Supreme Court? I'm not familiar with how knowledgable judges are, but what are the chances that even if I use these two arguments, the judge would not know the specifics of the Goldsmith case and rule in my favor?
Assuming that I was driving the vehicle, my only option now would be to argue against the yellow light timing / maintenance of the camera / proper placing of signage.

