Results 1 to 3 of 3

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Behind a Desk
    Posts
    98,846

    Default Re: Does Making a Motion for Speedy Trial Mean I No Longer Need 14 Days Notice of Tri

    You mean, might it be scheduled within 14 days of the time the court sent the original notice of hearing? That requirement is not changed.

    If the court cannot schedule a timely hearing, despite your having moved for a speedy trial pursuant to IRLJ 2.6(d), then you can consider moving for dismissal under subrule (f).

  2. #2

    Default Re: Does Making a Motion for Speedy Trial Mean I No Longer Need 14 Days Notice of Tri

    Would I move to dismiss through writing? Or would I make the motion verbally at the pre-hearing conference?

    1. Sponsored Links
       

Similar Threads

  1. Motions: Motion for a Speedy Trial for a Speeding Ticket, and Motion to Dismiss
    By Ezzie in forum Moving Violations, Parking and Traffic Tickets
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 01-20-2015, 10:31 PM
  2. Motions: Speedy Trial: When is a Motion for Dismissal Possible
    By ranma5080 in forum Moving Violations, Parking and Traffic Tickets
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 06-12-2012, 01:49 PM
  3. Motions: California Trial De Novo, Speedy Trial (45 Days), and Informal Discovery
    By zxd in forum Moving Violations, Parking and Traffic Tickets
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 11-28-2009, 01:40 PM
  4. Pretrial Motions: Motion for Speedy Trial
    By Flhelper in forum Criminal Procedure
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 02-14-2009, 10:51 AM
  5. Pretrial Motions: Right to A Speedy Trial, Motion to Dismiss
    By advicenow in forum Criminal Procedure
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 09-13-2008, 08:19 AM
 
 
Sponsored Links

Legal Help, Information and Resources