Has anyone had success in objecting to evidence in an administrative hearing? Because the strict rules of evidence it would seem that all evidence is submitted but the weight is a matter for the ALJ.
However, I have read that at the conclusion of the ALJ's opening statement they will give a brief description of the document and evidence, and at such time there is a possibility to object.
If the rules of evidence do not apply, what basis can an objection be made? Also, does anyone have any experience successfully submitting a written brief to an ALJ to better address an issue?
---I am trying to exclude some video surveillance, or at least the doctor's reaction to the video surveillance.

