is there a evidence standard that an attorney has to meet if he sueing you for a clooection agency?
example: 1) what is the acceptable evidence that the debtor owes the collection agency. (the card statement is not evidence?!)
2) can a card statement be used as a right of claim document? it shows no connection between the card co. and the agency.
3) In the absence of a letter of assignment, a right of claim document, can the judge just take the attorney's word, only because he said so.
4) In the absence of the above mentioned documents, will a judge allow the attorney to continue with the case or dismiss for lack of evidence.

