This is a SECTOR ticket, meaning that the vehicle and driver info was likely directly scanned from a bar code on your license and registration documents. So, the info is the same on your DOL record. Any typo still matches the DOL record. In any event, there is sufficient info to identify the specific vehicle you were driving and the typo is inconsequential.
Actually, he did...the radar was a Bee III #R2580.
The burden of proof that the specific radar requires different training than other doppler radar units designed for police use will be on you...and I don't think you will be able to meet that burden.
You may have a point that will work in your favor here. The officer does not specify that the forks were designed to test that specific radar model. It is implied "(manufacturer's serial numbers)," but not specified. That could raise reasonable doubt in the judge's mind.
Again, this omission MAY carry some weight. But, I suspect that the officer's statements that he visually observed your speed and yours was the only vehicle within the radar's beam will be sufficient to overcome this omission.
However, you may also be able to get some traction based on the officer's statement of "the defendant was observed..." The officer does not say WHO made this observation and it is, therefore, hearsay. Washington case law requires an officer to make a visual observation that leads to a reasonable suspicion that a vehicle is speeding. Only then can he/she use the radar to verify the visual observation. Since the officer does not state that he made such observation, you may be able to get a judge to throw out the radar verification.
But, your statement that you were "very sorry and not aware he got going that fast" is a pretty clear admission of guilt. That may make any other arguments difficult.

