I once scripted a bunch of questions for a friend to ask and put a few notes in between. He asked the first question, and the officer answered. Then, he read the next note and the judge interrupted, saying that was a statement or argument, not a question. When the judge said this was the time for questions and asked whether there were any others, the defendant said "No." The judge said he could continue with whatever argument he had and my friend read the remaining questions and comments without stopping. After that, the officer answered some of the questions in order, but the defendant didn't follow up on or challenge any individual answers. I guess I thought the defendant knew to ask the questions individually and wait for individual answers but I guessed wrong. The result was a conviction. In my own case later on, I used many of the same arguments about a similar violation (red light camera) and the result was an acquittal.