That's possible, but it didn't sound that way.
I just read Berger vs Berger pretty thoroughly and I don't think its on point. It was purely a custody case that had no financial issues involved other than referencing means of supporting children. I also read Postema v Postema and it is significantly more on point, but still, it was about a judge setting a value on a law degree earned during the marriage, and treating that as a marital asset, with a value, and awarding a portion of that value to the other spouse. However in the case the marital savings were still divided at the time of divorce.See Berger v Berger, 277 Mich App 700; 747 N.W.2d 336 (2008).
With this OP, we are talking about marital savings accrued during the marriage. Based on the fact that he was able to save apparently significant money during this incredibly short marriage I am not sure that his wife's "advanced training" was financed through his sacrifices. His claim to need 4 years of "advanced" training himself at this time is a little questionable considering that he has been making regular use of a significant education fund provided by his employer.
He really needs to consult an attorney with whom he can lay out the details that he apparently does not care to indulge here, to determine if somehow its possible that he would not have to split the marital savings.

