
Quoting
Mr. Knowitall
I would argue that the claim didn't accrue until termination of the tenancy; the landlord's argument appears to be that the claim accrues annually, even if non-payment triggers the obligation to pay at the termination of the tenancy.
I was coming back to point that out, too. But then a nagging thought hit me. What if OP wasn't quoting the law properly, so I looked up the Los Angeles Rent Stabilization Ordinance and here is the entire section on security deposit interest:
SEC. 151.06.02. PAYMENT OF INTEREST ON SECURITY DEPOSITS.
(Added by Ord. No. 166,368, Eff. 12/6/90.)
A. Security deposit is defined in Section 1950.5 of the California Civil Code.
B. (Amended by Ord. No. 174,017, Eff. 7/16/01.) A landlord who is subject to the provisions of Section 1950.5 of the California Civil Code shall pay annually interest on all security deposits held for at least one year for his or her tenants as follows:
1. (Amended by Ord. No. 175,020, Eff. 2/1/03.) Beginning January 1, 2003, the landlord may determine the annual rate of interest by either of the following methods:
(a) Using the annual rate of interest established by the Rent Adjustment Commission (RAC). That rate shall be based on the average of the interest rates on savings accounts paid on September 1 of the previous year, by at least five Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) insured banks with branches in Los Angeles. RAC shall adopt the rate by November 30 of each year and shall publish that rate in a newspaper of general circulation within one week after it is established each year. The interest rate established by the RAC shall be the rate in effect from January 1 through December 31 of the subsequent year.
(b) Using the actual interest earned on each security deposit account each year. If the landlord chooses this method of determining the amount of interest due at the time of payment of the security deposit interest, the landlord shall provide the tenant with bank statements indicating the amount of interest earned on the security deposit for that year. In the event the landlord fails to provide that information to the tenant at the time it transmits payment of the interest to the tenant, the interest rate required to be paid, shall be the rate set by RAC.
(c) No interest shall accrue on security deposits for the period of January 1, 2002 through December 31, 2002.
2. The annual interest rate shall be 2% simple interest per annum for tenants’ security deposits held during the period of January 1, 2001, through December 31, 2001.
3. The annual interest rate shall be 5% simple interest per annum for tenants’ security deposits held during the period of November 1, 1990, through December 31, 2000.
4. The Housing and Community Investment Department ("HCID") shall identify the established interest rate in the annual rental unit registration billings mailed to landlords. HCID shall publish the established interest rate in a newspaper of general circulation. (Amended by Ord. No. 182,718, Eff. 10/30/13.)
C. (Amended by Ord. No. 174,017, Eff. 7/16/01.) Interest shall begin accruing on November 1, 1990, on a monthly basis. A tenant shall be given the unpaid accrued interest in the form of either a direct payment or a credit against the tenant’s rent. The landlord shall choose between these two methods of payment and notify the tenant in writing of his or her choice. The landlord may elect to pay the accrued interest on a monthly or yearly basis.
D. Upon termination of tenancy, only the tenant whose security deposit has been held for one year or more shall be entitled to payment of any unpaid accumulated interest on the security deposit. Such payment shall be made at the same time and in the same manner as required for return of security deposits in California Civil Code Section 1950.5(f).
E. Upon termination of a landlord’s interest in a property, all accumulated interest on security deposits shall be disposed of in the same manner as required for security deposits by California Civil Code Sections 1950.5(g) and (h).
F. Nothing herein shall preclude a landlord from exercising his or her discretion in investing security deposits.
G. In the event the landlord fails to pay interest on the security deposit as provided in this section, the tenant may bring an action for recovery of the amount owed in a court of the appropriate jurisdiction including, but not limited to, small claims court.
H. The provisions of this section shall not govern mobile home parks.
Note the areas that I emphasized in bold.
My interpretation is that the landlord has to pay annually (either once a month or once a year) and if he fails to comply it appears that OP would have had to file in small claims court for the failure to pay the interest at the end of each year and not wait 17 years to exercise the annual option.
Further, since this is a statutory obligation and not a contractual obligation (as far as we know) I doubt that any statute of limitation applies and I would think that the OP would be estopped from enforcing the statute for anything other than the year that has just passed.
I could be wrong about that so I would encourage the OP to file suit for the 17 years worth of interest and see how a judge interprets that ordinance.
I have not found any case law addressing the matter one way or the other and I would be loath to rely on a phone conversation with a bureaucrat.