
Quoting
jk
as I said, whether a party is a homosexual or not is generally relevant to a case. Suits are based on actions, or lack or actions, due to some behavior. Whether that involves an issue that a party is gay or not would make it a gay rights issue but outside of such cases, there is no reason to ever know if a party is gay or not.
You did nothing to clarify what you were actually looking for. As I said, if you are looking for gay parties to a suit, best of luck since that is not something that is recorded in the records unless the homosexual status was part of the issue the suit involves. If you are looking for actions that were undertaken based on homosexual discrimination, that would at least allow you to narrow your search somewhat.
In other words;
you will not find listing of suits where the parties have identified themselves as homosexuals unless you are looking for suits that involve actions or lack of actions of others due to them being homosexual. That is the only reason their homosexuality would be pertinent to the case.
for the same reasons, you won't find cases won or lost by women or men or black men or women or Asian men or women (or any ethnicity) or handicapped or anything else unless the case involves that fact as a basis for the action.