A company files criminal charges indicating that veiwing the security video is what lead to the accusation of shoplifting. Does anyone know whether or not they are required to keep that tape for use as evidence in court even though 3 employees picked accused out of a photo line?
Many innocent people are incarcerated based on eye witnesses. Eye witness is far from perfect.
Video, on the other hand is not going to have lapses, distortions, etc..in its ability to recall what it has witnessed. So logic should dictate that if a video observation is stated in the charging docs, it should be required, under subpeona if neccessary, to be included as evidence...? Thanks

