I'll start serving the Brie. Evidently it's needed.
I'll start serving the Brie. Evidently it's needed.
yes, it has been answered. It just has not been answered how you think it should be answered so you ignore the correct answers already given.Saywhat?!;785805]Actually, no, the question has not even yet been answered.
Now that is something very different. Here you suggest it may have been answered but you just didn't like how it was presented.If you can show me where it was answered from someone with any shred of credibility who wasn't at the same time being condescending and rude I'll retract that and honestly as I've already said, it's not the pay that concerns me, it the protected time.
MAY. When he does and you can prove it, then you might have something.In my original post that no one bothered to read I said my boss may use that time against me in a performance review.
should be? At this point, it either was or was not acknowledged as FMLA time. Was it or not?While he may be a decent guy, he's incorrect in saying he can use what should be protected time against me in a no fault absence policy.
there is no 5 day waiting period regarding FMLA.They skirted FMLA regulations here for reasons beyond me because it usually benefits the employer to designate FMLA time properly, that way no one gets more than the 12 weeks allowed. These are facts the only thing in question was the 5 day waiting period.
Oh, that's right. You are confusing an employer controlled policy with the protections afforded by the FMLA. Your mistake. Your employer controls your pay. Your employer can (and apparently has) applied available PTO to your leave time. The law allows for that.
If you had read the entire post you'd have seen that my co-workers and I have great relationships. We all get along just fine. One was angry when I told her what was said to me, she went to her boss to complain about it. They aren't staff lunches, they are a group of co-workers choosing to go to lunch, often coworkers from different departments. The issue was never with my co-workers. I never said it was with my co-workers. One said, I know you have stuff to do, it doesn't bother me. Bless her heart it shouldn't bother anyonethe problem with that is?. It was a stupid, lame way for them to use my son's disability as a way to deny me a raise.
if the employer sees your private life as an obstruction to your obligations to work as they deem proper, they can hold it against you. Again, your child is your problem, not your employers.
actually, you really have not shown anything the employer did as illegal. At worst, he did not properly acknowledge your leave as FMLA time. Care to guess what that gets YOU? How about a big heaping pile of nothing and the fine to the employer is quite minimal.They should have went another route, they didn't, their illegal mistake.
Only if leave time that was qualified as FMLA time is used against you, but only in regards to the protections afforded under FMLA, would you have a claim against the employer. When that happens, well, then you can whine.
yet nearly impossible to read due to your poor structuring of your post.These two came right out and insulted me for absolutely no reason. My post was long, true, but clear and easy to follow.
I am thrilled to hear I am not normal, in your opinion. You have no idea how normal that makes me feel given the person declaring me not normal is...well, a person most normal people would not deem normal.If they felt it was too long they should have skipped it not gone on a tirade about what a POS I was an enumerate the ways I'm wrong without even reading it. Normal people don't behave that way.
words YOU obviously should live by.. If they do not wish to have it served right back, then don't start being a dick about things you know nothing about.
Your issues are so obvious, it takes little of your drivel to figure out who you are, psychologically speaking.If trying to be hurtful and insulting and claiming you can diagnose a personality disorder from a handful of internet posts you've disrespected yourself and your profession, shame on you.
Right there is a perfect example. Here is her response:Cbg has not proven herself a lovely person at all. She may be your friend and that's great, I'm very happy for you but she was rude and condescending to me from the get go with no provocation from me whatsoever. Again, if the length of the post bothered her she was free to skip it.
Rude? Condescending? Where?Too long. While you still can, go in and edit to include some white space. I'm not even going to try to read a huge block of text like that - my eyes would never forgive me.
More like concise and factual.
It was a simple statement to you that your post was extremely difficult to read. She even alluded to the fact that the ability to edit a post is time limited. Were you aware of that fact? Sounds a lot more like helpful information than rude or condescending.
actually, you are the one that continues to be wrong is many statements. Just because you think cbg is wrong does not make her wrong.Also, her information was wrong, plain and simple.
apparently you are reading posts nobody else is since she has not done anything of the sort.If she's trying to convince everyone employers don't have any responsibilities regarding FMLA notice she's lying or extremely misguided.
.You are the one that started the rude interaction between cbg and yourself.Her being rude about it as well, now that's just bizarre but not entirely unexpected in an anonymous internet chat room.
they have my pity if you post there anything close in style that you have here. You claim to be all knowing and nobody but yourself could ever be correct. I suspect you have ruined many family's lives with your God complex claiming yourself the all knowing benefactor of all those that are blessed enough to read your whining commentaries.I spend a good deal of my own free time in a forum similar to this for parents of special needs children.
yet you appear so ignorant of the facts of the situation. Maybe you need to seek more training. It likely won't help until you get off your cross though. You might also visit a doctor who can remove your cranium from your rectum as well. That condition may be a huge part of your problem since your hearing is likely impaired considerably.I received my certification, attended the training and spent countless hours cross referencing federal law and state statutes.
Yet strangely enough, none of that has crossed over to this forum. I suspect you believe what you say but suspect that very few actually agree with you. The problem with people that make claims such as that and then act exactly the opposite while making those claims; they are usually either lying or have no true perception of themselves.When I share my knowledge I am NEVER anything but compassionate, empathetic and sympathetic.
Aww, the love is so great. Sorry you feel so challenged but lashing out when you are wrong is a very poor response for a person that has a child such as you do. It suggests your child might do better with others.And the other one, jk, not much to say about that poor person except for, what an idiot