My question involves collection proceedings in the State of: Louisiana
I was contacted by an attorney's office in reference to a debt that appears to have been purchased by a junk buyer. I immediately requested a validation of the debt explicitly requesting proof that their client owns the debt, has the right to collect it and a detailed account of how the debt was calculated within 30 days.
The attorney failed to provide the requested documentation and only responded with a letter that basically stated: This person owns the debt, and this is how much you owe.
Now, four months later, they have enter the courts and had me served with an "admission of facts." I responded saying that I could not admit to any facts because I am not familiar with the plaintiff, nor have I been provided with any proof of ownership and legal right to collect.
Today, I received another communication asking for "account interrogatories," and another copy of the non-validating, validation that they previously sent.
I would like to file a motion for summary judgement based on the facts provided and the plaintiffs failure to comply with the Federal Credit Recovery Protection Act. Is it as simple as that? Do I have a valid case for judgement in my favor?

